Loomis v. Wisconsin began as a routine sentencing hearing in a La Crosse County courtroom, but it would become one of the most significant challenges to algorithmic governance in American legal history. On February 14, 2013, Eric Loomis pled guilty to attempting to flee an officer and operating a vehicle without the owner’s consent. What happened next revealed how artificial agents had quietly inserted themselves into the most sacred processes of democratic justice.1

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Algorithmic Governance

  • Chirag Shah

摘要

Loomis v. Wisconsin began as a routine sentencing hearing in a La Crosse County courtroom, but it would become one of the most significant challenges to algorithmic governance in American legal history. On February 14, 2013, Eric Loomis pled guilty to attempting to flee an officer and operating a vehicle without the owner’s consent. What happened next revealed how artificial agents had quietly inserted themselves into the most sacred processes of democratic justice.1