The rheology of drilling mud is significantly affected by viscosity, salt concentration, temperature, and nanoparticle concentration. This study uses two machine learning techniques to predict the viscosity and filtration loss of water-based mud containing zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) nanoparticles as a function of concentration, shear rate, temperature, time, and differential pressure. The techniques utilized are artificial neural network (ANN) and random forest (RF). Both machine learning algorithms are tuned to acquire the best set of hyper-parameters. Results yielded by the algorithms are compared using statistical error matrices. The predicted results achieve R2 value higher than 0.9 for both models. The comparative analysis from the outcomes of both models exhibits that shear rate and time contributed the most to the variation in viscosity and fluid loss, respectively. After further validation of developed models with experimental data, a good agreement between predicted and experimental data is found.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Prediction of Rheological and Filtration Loss Properties of Nano-Zirconium-Dioxide Drilling Fluids via Machine Learning Techniques for Energy Exploration

  • Cheah Jason,
  • Suhaib Umer Ilyas,
  • Syahrir Ridha,
  • Umara Sehar,
  • Mustafa Alsaady,
  • Shwetank Krishna

摘要

The rheology of drilling mud is significantly affected by viscosity, salt concentration, temperature, and nanoparticle concentration. This study uses two machine learning techniques to predict the viscosity and filtration loss of water-based mud containing zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) nanoparticles as a function of concentration, shear rate, temperature, time, and differential pressure. The techniques utilized are artificial neural network (ANN) and random forest (RF). Both machine learning algorithms are tuned to acquire the best set of hyper-parameters. Results yielded by the algorithms are compared using statistical error matrices. The predicted results achieve R2 value higher than 0.9 for both models. The comparative analysis from the outcomes of both models exhibits that shear rate and time contributed the most to the variation in viscosity and fluid loss, respectively. After further validation of developed models with experimental data, a good agreement between predicted and experimental data is found.