Austroads Guide to Pavement Technology Part 6 Unsealed Pavements (AGPT6) provides recommended design processes and a thickness design chart based on empirical methods. The Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Unsealed Roads Best Practice Guide also provides guidance on pavement thickness design and provides a similar design chart. However, the empirical design charts are only applicable to design Equivalent Standard Axles (DESA) of less than 5 × 105. Often unsealed roads in Western Australia are designed based on a single pavement layer constructed from locally available gravel material. This study aims to provide some design charts and an associated design spreadsheet for pavement thickness design along with some practical guidance to enable concept or budget level designs to be completed for heavily trafficked unsealed pavements. The design methodology incorporates an assessment of the DESA and uses mechanistic design processes, dependent on whether the proposed pavement is a combined basecourse and wearing course or has a separate wearing course, to provide a recommended pavement profile including accounting for gravel loss. The methodology, assumptions and calculation methods are outlined, and the design charts and spreadsheet output examples are provided.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Development of Design Charts for Pavement Thickness Design of Unsealed Mine Access Roads Subject to High Volume Heavy Vehicle Traffic

  • Alex Petty

摘要

Austroads Guide to Pavement Technology Part 6 Unsealed Pavements (AGPT6) provides recommended design processes and a thickness design chart based on empirical methods. The Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Unsealed Roads Best Practice Guide also provides guidance on pavement thickness design and provides a similar design chart. However, the empirical design charts are only applicable to design Equivalent Standard Axles (DESA) of less than 5 × 105. Often unsealed roads in Western Australia are designed based on a single pavement layer constructed from locally available gravel material. This study aims to provide some design charts and an associated design spreadsheet for pavement thickness design along with some practical guidance to enable concept or budget level designs to be completed for heavily trafficked unsealed pavements. The design methodology incorporates an assessment of the DESA and uses mechanistic design processes, dependent on whether the proposed pavement is a combined basecourse and wearing course or has a separate wearing course, to provide a recommended pavement profile including accounting for gravel loss. The methodology, assumptions and calculation methods are outlined, and the design charts and spreadsheet output examples are provided.