The exploration of hydrokinetic energy has received significant attention in recent years. The cross-flow turbine-based Savonius rotor is popular for its excellent starting capability and moderate conversion efficiency. The present work numerically investigates the assessment of hydrokinetic energy utilization by deploying the circular deflectors upstream of Savonius rotor placement. The results have also been compared to without deflector-augmented Savonius rotor. Two positions (equispaced) in the upstream and downstream sides of the placement of the turbine are selected. The results demonstrate the variations of the kinetic energy at different angular positions. It is also observed that the deflector-augmented Savonius rotor is about 179.01 and 40.65% more effective in energy utilization in the vicinity (X3–X2) and far-field (X4–X1) locations, respectively, compared to without deflector Savonius rotor. Further, the gain in the hydrokinetic energy for circular deflector-assisted Savonius rotor is more due to guided flow and backward drag force reduction on the returning side blade.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Hydrokinetic Energy Utilization Assessment on Deployment of Circular Deflector for Savonius Turbine

  • Omveer Singh,
  • Gaurav Saini,
  • Ashoke De

摘要

The exploration of hydrokinetic energy has received significant attention in recent years. The cross-flow turbine-based Savonius rotor is popular for its excellent starting capability and moderate conversion efficiency. The present work numerically investigates the assessment of hydrokinetic energy utilization by deploying the circular deflectors upstream of Savonius rotor placement. The results have also been compared to without deflector-augmented Savonius rotor. Two positions (equispaced) in the upstream and downstream sides of the placement of the turbine are selected. The results demonstrate the variations of the kinetic energy at different angular positions. It is also observed that the deflector-augmented Savonius rotor is about 179.01 and 40.65% more effective in energy utilization in the vicinity (X3–X2) and far-field (X4–X1) locations, respectively, compared to without deflector Savonius rotor. Further, the gain in the hydrokinetic energy for circular deflector-assisted Savonius rotor is more due to guided flow and backward drag force reduction on the returning side blade.