Optimizing Ecological Development Zone Selection: A Comparative Analysis of AHP and DEA-Modified VAHP Approaches in Geography

This chapter delves into the practical application of decision science in geography, specifically focusing on the utilization of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology. Acknowledging the limitations inherent in the conventional AHP method, a novel approach called Voting Analytical Hierarchy Process (VAHP) is proposed, which seamlessly integrates the principles of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Emphasizing the significance of selecting appropriate ecological development zones, the chapter navigates through the challenges that arise in decision-making within this field. Additionally, the advantages and disadvantages of AHP and DEA are discussed, underscoring their respective roles in multi-criteria decision-making and performance evaluation. The VAHP approach emerges as a potent decision support tool, as it actively engages experts in the prioritization process, mitigating judgmental inconsistencies. Furthermore, the chapter presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of AHP and VAHP, executed through a case study within the realm of geography, thus providing valuable insights into their efficacy and reliability. The outcomes of this research contribute significantly to the advancement of decision science in geography and yield practical implications for promoting sustainable ecological development. As the chapter concludes, it offers insightful recommendations for researchers intending to employ AHP, DEA, and VAHP in analogous decision-making contexts. Overall, this chapter serves as a valuable resource, equipping both academics and practitioners in the field of geography with a comprehensive understanding of the application of AHP, DEA, and VAHP.