Theories of Procedural Adjudication
摘要
The procedure for excluding illegal evidence exemplifies procedural adjudication within the legal system. This procedure ensures that evidence obtained through violations of legal standards, such as illegal searches or coerced confessions, is deemed inadmissible in court. It aims to uphold judicial integrity, protect individual rights, and deter law enforcement from engaging in unlawful activities. This chapter explores the fundamental theories underpinning the procedure for excluding illegal evidence. Leveraging extensive theoretical exploration and practical experience, we aim to deliver a systematic and scientific understanding of this crucial aspect of procedural adjudication. Our key areas of analysis include the following. The first area examines the nature of the procedure. We discuss the essence and fundamental characteristics of the procedure for excluding illegal evidence, focusing on its purpose, scope, and applicability within the legal framework. The second area explores the function of the procedure for excluding illegal evidence. We analyze its role in safeguarding legal integrity, protecting individual rights, and upholding the rule of law. The third area addresses the subject matter of the procedure for excluding illegal evidence. We define the types of evidence subject to exclusion and the criteria for determining their legality. The fourth area analyzes the procedural structure governing the exclusion of illegal evidence. This includes detailing the steps involved, the rights and obligations of the parties, and the judiciary’s role in overseeing the process. The fifth area examines the relationship between the exclusion procedure and substantive adjudication. We discuss how the exclusionary rule influences the outcomes of legal disputes and its implications for justice and fairness. By addressing these fundamental questions, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the procedure for excluding illegal evidence and highlight its significance in the broader context of legal practice and theory.