Scholarlink

Plaintiff shipper had no right to claim Defendant carrier to bear the loss of the delivery of the goods without a document, because the bill of lading in its possession could not be used as a proof of Defendant’s acceptance of the goods from Plaintiff, and did not match the customs declaration obtained, which could not prove that the source of the goods and the actual transportation were related to Plaintiff.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Ningbo Ketai Medical Instruments Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Haofan International Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd.

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Martin Davies,
  • Jiang Lin

摘要

Plaintiff shipper had no right to claim Defendant carrier to bear the loss of the delivery of the goods without a document, because the bill of lading in its possession could not be used as a proof of Defendant’s acceptance of the goods from Plaintiff, and did not match the customs declaration obtained, which could not prove that the source of the goods and the actual transportation were related to Plaintiff.