Plaintiff consignee purchased a quantity of 51,999.301 tons of lees, and the consignee insured the goods with an insurance company. Subsequently, the ship belonging to Defendant carrier carried the lees purchased by the consignee to the ports of Zhangzhou, China, and Nansha, China, respectively, at an actual unit price of USD272 per ton, plus freight. The master of the ship issued three original bills of lading, all of which stated that they were in “good apparent condition”.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Xiamen Jianfa Agricultural Products Co., Ltd. v. Sea Dolphin Shipping Limited

  • Martin Davies,
  • Jiang Lin

摘要

Plaintiff consignee purchased a quantity of 51,999.301 tons of lees, and the consignee insured the goods with an insurance company. Subsequently, the ship belonging to Defendant carrier carried the lees purchased by the consignee to the ports of Zhangzhou, China, and Nansha, China, respectively, at an actual unit price of USD272 per ton, plus freight. The master of the ship issued three original bills of lading, all of which stated that they were in “good apparent condition”.