The velocity with which malware has been developing over the years has a direct effect on innovative malware analysis techniques which in turn assists in eradicating any potential threats in today’s dynamic digital space. This review examines how emerging technologies such as cloud-sandboxing, behavior-based detection systems, and threat intelligence affect the performance of the software solution. With the help of a detailed comparative approach, one should draw attention to the most typical windows of the above tools within one or several key performance indicators such as efficiency, expandability, rate of convergence with a real-time fingerprint, adequacy of cost, and network analysis. It further argues the essence of Arm’s wide coverage, greater automation, and more real-time support to contain more advanced and sophisticated threats to the security of computer systems and networks. In addition, use of these solutions in the context of more general security models is considered in order to evaluate their capabilities for active protection and active defense. Addressing the various strengths and weaknesses of each tool against such a critical set of criteria is one way this review assists to help organizations implement practical, flexible, and robust malware detection and mitigation policies. Their research helps to whose number of the devices in the network increases drastically lessen the gaps on further cyber warfare.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Benchmarking Malware Detection Tools: A Study on Tool Efficiency and Real-Time Feedback

  • Harshal Valvi,
  • C. Tamilselvan,
  • Arun Mohan,
  • Sini S. Nair

摘要

The velocity with which malware has been developing over the years has a direct effect on innovative malware analysis techniques which in turn assists in eradicating any potential threats in today’s dynamic digital space. This review examines how emerging technologies such as cloud-sandboxing, behavior-based detection systems, and threat intelligence affect the performance of the software solution. With the help of a detailed comparative approach, one should draw attention to the most typical windows of the above tools within one or several key performance indicators such as efficiency, expandability, rate of convergence with a real-time fingerprint, adequacy of cost, and network analysis. It further argues the essence of Arm’s wide coverage, greater automation, and more real-time support to contain more advanced and sophisticated threats to the security of computer systems and networks. In addition, use of these solutions in the context of more general security models is considered in order to evaluate their capabilities for active protection and active defense. Addressing the various strengths and weaknesses of each tool against such a critical set of criteria is one way this review assists to help organizations implement practical, flexible, and robust malware detection and mitigation policies. Their research helps to whose number of the devices in the network increases drastically lessen the gaps on further cyber warfare.