Scholarlink

In the study of higher-order argumentation frameworks (HO-AFs), the validity of attacks plays a particular role. In this paper, we further study HO-AF theory by focusing on this validity of attacks w.r.t. a set of arguments. Given a set of arguments, the attacks whose sources are in this set are classified into seven types, and the attacks whose sources are out of this set are classified into five types. This classification provides a theoretical foundation for the further study of HO-AF semantics.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Validity of Attacks Related to Argument Set in Higher-Order Argumentation Frameworks

  • 会议论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Hengfei Li,
  • Jiachao Wu

摘要

In the study of higher-order argumentation frameworks (HO-AFs), the validity of attacks plays a particular role. In this paper, we further study HO-AF theory by focusing on this validity of attacks w.r.t. a set of arguments. Given a set of arguments, the attacks whose sources are in this set are classified into seven types, and the attacks whose sources are out of this set are classified into five types. This classification provides a theoretical foundation for the further study of HO-AF semantics.