Advantages and Limitations vs. Other Medical Imaging Techniques
摘要
This chapter examines intraoperative imaging techniques for margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Traditional methods like frozen section analysis and imprint cytology reduce reoperations (3.6–13.2%) but demand specialized pathology teams and time-intensive workflows. Intraoperative ultrasound lowers tumor-involved margins (3–4%) yet struggles with multifocal lesions and calcifications. Emerging NIR-II fluorescence imaging provides real-time, high-resolution visualization (up to 4 mm depth) without ionizing radiation, surpassing visible-light methods. However, its limited penetration compared to MRI/CT restricts deep-tissue use. Clinical trials underscore NIR-II’s potential as an adjunct tool, though fluorophore stability and targeted probe development remain challenges. Integrating NIR-II with conventional modalities may refine surgical precision, which reduces reoperations and healthcare costs. Advancements in hybrid imaging and contrast agents are pivotal for broader clinical adoption.