Participatory mapping, a methodological approach within participatory design, uses maps to engage participants in actively representing their knowledge and perceptions of the environment. In the context of this study, participation is examined from the lens of democratic principles, more specifically linked to the abstract concepts of representation and agency. It is observed that small-scale design studies can offer more nuanced understandings of abstract concepts and refine future participatory design strategies and methods. This small-scale study conducted with tertiary students explores the intersection of participatory mapping and democratic participation through qualitative analysis (discourse analysis) of the data collected from the audio and video recordings, the artefact (map) produced, and the feedback from all the participants. Despite efforts to ensure fair representation, findings reveal complexities in democratic processes during mapping activities. The dominance of certain participants, influenced by gender dynamics and perceived expertise, shapes consensus building. Statistical support for arguments can override diverse perspectives that are essential for inclusive decision-making, highlighting challenges to equal agency. Through empirical observations and participant feedback, this study uncovers the intricacies of democratic participation and offers implications for future participatory mapping workshops, emphasising the importance of empathic engagements, inclusive design approaches, and methodological adaptations for meaningful outcomes.