This chapter focuses on civic organisations’ criticism of Seoul’s light railway transport plan and their exclusion from the knowledge politics surrounding the projected development. Using the snowball method, members from civic organisation were contacted and asked to participate in interviews. Interviewees explained that the confidentiality of development plans hindered their meaningful participation in negotiations with the city government to use public funds to improve existing mass transit systems rather build new large-scale development projects. As a strategic response, these groups chose to abstain from discussions, considering their long-term political opportunity structure. This case study illustrates non-participation as a deliberate communication strategy, revealing its potential to influence governance decisions without direct confrontation.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Non-participation in the Furtherance of Participatory Governance?—Compromises in Seoul Transport

  • HaeRan Shin

摘要

This chapter focuses on civic organisations’ criticism of Seoul’s light railway transport plan and their exclusion from the knowledge politics surrounding the projected development. Using the snowball method, members from civic organisation were contacted and asked to participate in interviews. Interviewees explained that the confidentiality of development plans hindered their meaningful participation in negotiations with the city government to use public funds to improve existing mass transit systems rather build new large-scale development projects. As a strategic response, these groups chose to abstain from discussions, considering their long-term political opportunity structure. This case study illustrates non-participation as a deliberate communication strategy, revealing its potential to influence governance decisions without direct confrontation.