This chapter explores a profound reinterpretation of the classical social contract in the digital era, which is powered by the pervasive influence of digital surveillance, algorithmic decision making, and data sovereignty. It examines how the borderless nature of cyberspace challenges the state’s traditional territorial authority, leading to a crisis of legitimacy. The chapter proposes “transparency as the new consent” as a fundamental concept for reestablishing trust and accountability between the state and the citizen in an algorithmic driven society. By comparing cyber governance models in China, India, and Estonia, it reveals an important relationship between political will, societal values, and technological design decisions, highlighting the various approaches that states are using in their adaptation of the social contract. The findings highlight the pressing need for proactive policy frameworks and new ethical political contracts to guarantee equity, fairness, and human agency in a world growing more automated. This also shows that the future of government will be shaped by deliberate choices that respect democratic values and human dignity.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Cybersecurity and Governance: Reconceptualizing Cyber Ethics in an Age of Autonomous Systems

  • Zuhaib Maqbool,
  • Himabindu Mukthipudi

摘要

This chapter explores a profound reinterpretation of the classical social contract in the digital era, which is powered by the pervasive influence of digital surveillance, algorithmic decision making, and data sovereignty. It examines how the borderless nature of cyberspace challenges the state’s traditional territorial authority, leading to a crisis of legitimacy. The chapter proposes “transparency as the new consent” as a fundamental concept for reestablishing trust and accountability between the state and the citizen in an algorithmic driven society. By comparing cyber governance models in China, India, and Estonia, it reveals an important relationship between political will, societal values, and technological design decisions, highlighting the various approaches that states are using in their adaptation of the social contract. The findings highlight the pressing need for proactive policy frameworks and new ethical political contracts to guarantee equity, fairness, and human agency in a world growing more automated. This also shows that the future of government will be shaped by deliberate choices that respect democratic values and human dignity.