This chapter reports an experimental study on Hong Kong ESL learners’ engagement in two task types (debate and decision-making) implemented in different communication modes: face-to-face real-time communication (FTF) and immersive virtual reality (iVR). Fifty-six postgraduate ESL learners completed a debate task and a decision-making task, with half performing them in the FTF context and the other half in the iVR context. Task engagement was measured through a questionnaire covering behavioural, cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions. The results showed that learners were more emotionally and socially engaged in the decision-making task than in the debate task. However, task modality (FTF versus iVR) did not significantly affect engagement across either task type. These findings suggest that decision-making tasks may be a promising way to enhance task engagement.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Task Type and Modality: Comparing Engagement in Virtual Reality and Face-To-Face Contexts

  • Xuyan Qiu

摘要

This chapter reports an experimental study on Hong Kong ESL learners’ engagement in two task types (debate and decision-making) implemented in different communication modes: face-to-face real-time communication (FTF) and immersive virtual reality (iVR). Fifty-six postgraduate ESL learners completed a debate task and a decision-making task, with half performing them in the FTF context and the other half in the iVR context. Task engagement was measured through a questionnaire covering behavioural, cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions. The results showed that learners were more emotionally and socially engaged in the decision-making task than in the debate task. However, task modality (FTF versus iVR) did not significantly affect engagement across either task type. These findings suggest that decision-making tasks may be a promising way to enhance task engagement.