This chapter applies the new balance of alignment model developed in the book to the case of Vietnam’s recalibration of its foreign policy amid the collapse of the Soviet Union after the end of the Cold War. The case is assessed within the context of country’s overall foreign policy approach sometimes characterized in the contemporary context by policymakers as variations of multilateralization and diversification, with a wider focus on multidirectionality and integration dating back to an era of reform often referred to by the shorthand "doi moi" and past experiences including Vietnam's intervention into Cambodia. The chapter proceeds in three sections. The first section explores the evolving shape of adjustments in alignment during this period, delving into the specific indicators and metrics set out in the introduction with the use of original interviews conducted by the author as well as primary and secondary sources. The second section then explores the explanations for adjustments in alignment, arguing that the balance of alignment model offers a good explanation for the case in question and a better one than balance of power, which is the competing approach examined in the book. The third and final section then briefly summarizes the chapter findings.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Russia-Vietnam Recalibration and Post-Cold War Multidirectionality

  • Prashanth Parameswaran

摘要

This chapter applies the new balance of alignment model developed in the book to the case of Vietnam’s recalibration of its foreign policy amid the collapse of the Soviet Union after the end of the Cold War. The case is assessed within the context of country’s overall foreign policy approach sometimes characterized in the contemporary context by policymakers as variations of multilateralization and diversification, with a wider focus on multidirectionality and integration dating back to an era of reform often referred to by the shorthand "doi moi" and past experiences including Vietnam's intervention into Cambodia. The chapter proceeds in three sections. The first section explores the evolving shape of adjustments in alignment during this period, delving into the specific indicators and metrics set out in the introduction with the use of original interviews conducted by the author as well as primary and secondary sources. The second section then explores the explanations for adjustments in alignment, arguing that the balance of alignment model offers a good explanation for the case in question and a better one than balance of power, which is the competing approach examined in the book. The third and final section then briefly summarizes the chapter findings.