Corporate compliance systems can generally be classified into two distinct models based on the timing and context of their establishment: routine compliance management systems (also referred to as ex ante compliance or autonomous compliance) and crisis-responsive compliance remediation (also known as ex post compliance). The former denotes compliance systems proactively established by enterprises in the absence of external regulatory pressure. As a forward-looking mechanism, it is designed to identify and manage potential legal and regulatory risks in advance, and to ensure that corporate activities are conducted in accordance with applicable laws, administrative regulations, and internal governance standards. By contrast, the latter emerges in the aftermath of a legal or regulatory violation—typically in the context of administrative enforcement actions, criminal investigations, or international sanctions—and constitutes a remedial response aimed at mitigating adverse consequences, obtaining leniency, and restoring institutional legitimacy. In the context of routine compliance management systems, enterprises are generally not faced with immediate or clearly defined compliance risks. Accordingly, they tend to adopt a broad, management-oriented approach, constructing comprehensive systems that cover multiple regulatory areas and all stages of business operations. In contrast, crisis-responsive compliance remediation is usually initiated by enterprises implicated in misconduct. Driven by the imperative to avert legal sanctions and reputational damage, these enterprises often adopt a more targeted, risk-oriented strategy—focusing on remedying the specific type of violation involved and on building targeted compliance mechanisms to prevent recurrence.