Efforts have been made in defining artificial intelligence in higher education increasingly as advocacy relationships in shifting paradigms in the methods of teaching, learning, and administration to develop a personalized learning experience, improve decision-making, and operation efficiencies. These transformations are in the aspect of alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, especially about SDG4 on “inclusive and equitable quality education”. Unfortunately, such developments may also bring possible challenges and ethical issues relevant to their adoption. Some of these possible challenges include guaranteeing data privacy and security in relation to a possible dependence on data sets, tackling algorithmic biases that would threaten equity, and improving the overall technology gap to avoid more resource-poor institutions from being further marginalized. New pedagogical challenges arise as the possible revolution comes with the integration of AI-driven tools in the classroom, balancing all the benefits technology may bring with principles about what teaching at its best entails. Scalability and resource limitations add to disparity in distribution of the implementation. Issues relating to ethics also have considerable resonance, directly relevant to accountability and transparency of AI systems, the handling of intellectual properties, and cultural sensitivity to include a lot more. These issues further involve the ethical dimension of automations, their addressing with job insecurities concerning retaining student autonomy and critical thinking with the environment-involved AI production. This requires strong policy frameworks, initiatives to build capacities, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a good foundation in ethical principles for AI design. Therefore, it will inspire stakeholder involvement in an AI lifecycle as a fusion of trust and technology to educational goals and values. Addressing the above challenges within the AI system will immediately convey the importance of high participation among industrial stakeholders.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Challenges and Ethical Considerations in Integrating AI into Higher Education

  • Padmesh Tirunelveli Narayanapillai,
  • Thanammal Indu Vijayalakshmi,
  • Velu Vengadeshwaran

摘要

Efforts have been made in defining artificial intelligence in higher education increasingly as advocacy relationships in shifting paradigms in the methods of teaching, learning, and administration to develop a personalized learning experience, improve decision-making, and operation efficiencies. These transformations are in the aspect of alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, especially about SDG4 on “inclusive and equitable quality education”. Unfortunately, such developments may also bring possible challenges and ethical issues relevant to their adoption. Some of these possible challenges include guaranteeing data privacy and security in relation to a possible dependence on data sets, tackling algorithmic biases that would threaten equity, and improving the overall technology gap to avoid more resource-poor institutions from being further marginalized. New pedagogical challenges arise as the possible revolution comes with the integration of AI-driven tools in the classroom, balancing all the benefits technology may bring with principles about what teaching at its best entails. Scalability and resource limitations add to disparity in distribution of the implementation. Issues relating to ethics also have considerable resonance, directly relevant to accountability and transparency of AI systems, the handling of intellectual properties, and cultural sensitivity to include a lot more. These issues further involve the ethical dimension of automations, their addressing with job insecurities concerning retaining student autonomy and critical thinking with the environment-involved AI production. This requires strong policy frameworks, initiatives to build capacities, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a good foundation in ethical principles for AI design. Therefore, it will inspire stakeholder involvement in an AI lifecycle as a fusion of trust and technology to educational goals and values. Addressing the above challenges within the AI system will immediately convey the importance of high participation among industrial stakeholders.