This chapter examines the contestations, conflicts, and divergent interpretations of the emerging Circular Economy (CE) meta-rules such as reduce, reuse, recycle, and recover within the value chain of the Swedish heavy-duty vehicle sector. Building on insights from institutional theory, an analytical framework is proposed to enable an in-depth analysis of the diffusions and (re)interpretation processes of meta-rules across different interconnected systems part of a value chain. In doing so, the chapter contributes with an expanded theoretical understanding of how the prevailing logics within and across systems shape negotiation as well as implementation processes of meta-rules. Additionally, the analysis of the nascent circular value chain of the Swedish heavy-duty vehicle sector allows to theorize the broader implications of interpretative flexibility and clashing prioritizations of potential meta-rules for the speed and scope of multi-sector industrial transformations towards more circular practices.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

(Re)interpreting Circularity? Understanding the Contested Directionalities of the Swedish Heavy-Duty Vehicle Sector Towards the Circular Economy

  • Sophie-Marie Ertelt

摘要

This chapter examines the contestations, conflicts, and divergent interpretations of the emerging Circular Economy (CE) meta-rules such as reduce, reuse, recycle, and recover within the value chain of the Swedish heavy-duty vehicle sector. Building on insights from institutional theory, an analytical framework is proposed to enable an in-depth analysis of the diffusions and (re)interpretation processes of meta-rules across different interconnected systems part of a value chain. In doing so, the chapter contributes with an expanded theoretical understanding of how the prevailing logics within and across systems shape negotiation as well as implementation processes of meta-rules. Additionally, the analysis of the nascent circular value chain of the Swedish heavy-duty vehicle sector allows to theorize the broader implications of interpretative flexibility and clashing prioritizations of potential meta-rules for the speed and scope of multi-sector industrial transformations towards more circular practices.