Scholarlink

This study reviews Digital Humanities (DH) research to compare knowledge organization (KO) approaches between traditional DH and emerging Artificial Intelligence Humanities (AI Humanities). Using content analysis, we systematically examine how KO is applied in traditional DH and AI humanities. Traditional DH projects follow an “extraction-representation-storage-application” knowledge organization paradigm, focusing on improving the discoverability, accessibility, and comprehensibility of humanities knowledge. Generative AI technology widely influences and transforms the way of knowledge organization, shifting from a high technical threshold and professional knowledge requirements to simple natural language guidance, from rule-based frameworks to automatic processing with LLMs, from domain expert-led practices to intelligent user interactions, and from knowledge browsing to knowledge generation. Based on these shifts, the study proposes future directions for knowledge organization in AI humanities, providing insights for further research.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

From Digital Humanities to Artificial Intelligence Humanities: AI Applications in Knowledge Organization and Future Visions

  • 会议论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Shichao Luo,
  • Yang Wang

摘要

This study reviews Digital Humanities (DH) research to compare knowledge organization (KO) approaches between traditional DH and emerging Artificial Intelligence Humanities (AI Humanities). Using content analysis, we systematically examine how KO is applied in traditional DH and AI humanities. Traditional DH projects follow an “extraction-representation-storage-application” knowledge organization paradigm, focusing on improving the discoverability, accessibility, and comprehensibility of humanities knowledge. Generative AI technology widely influences and transforms the way of knowledge organization, shifting from a high technical threshold and professional knowledge requirements to simple natural language guidance, from rule-based frameworks to automatic processing with LLMs, from domain expert-led practices to intelligent user interactions, and from knowledge browsing to knowledge generation. Based on these shifts, the study proposes future directions for knowledge organization in AI humanities, providing insights for further research.