This chapter critically examines how Gender and Development (GAD) has drifted from its feminist political roots into a technocratic, depoliticised framework. Once grounded in structural critiques of patriarchy, GAD has increasingly been shaped by donor imperatives, bureaucratic compliance, and institutional containment. We trace the rise of ‘smart economics’, the individualisation of empowerment, and the reduction of feminist tools into bureaucratic instruments—changes that have rendered gender justice more visible but less transformative. As anti-gender backlash intensifies globally, GAD’s institutionalised forms have proven ill-equipped to defend hard-won gains or challenge power. Drawing on feminist scholarship, intersectional critique, and practitioner experience, we argue that reclaiming GAD as a political project demands more than better tools—it requires resourcing feminist movements, confronting systemic oppression, and moving from managerialism to cross-movement solidarity. Feminist organising, not technical fixes, is the most effective driver of gender justice. In an era of political repression, climate crisis, and shrinking civic space, it is time to reassert GAD’s radical origins and turn the power back on.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Gender Mainstreaming & Other Development Fantasies

  • Yeva Avakyan,
  • Krista Bywater,
  • Andrew Gleason,
  • Christina Gordon,
  • Sandra Johansson

摘要

This chapter critically examines how Gender and Development (GAD) has drifted from its feminist political roots into a technocratic, depoliticised framework. Once grounded in structural critiques of patriarchy, GAD has increasingly been shaped by donor imperatives, bureaucratic compliance, and institutional containment. We trace the rise of ‘smart economics’, the individualisation of empowerment, and the reduction of feminist tools into bureaucratic instruments—changes that have rendered gender justice more visible but less transformative. As anti-gender backlash intensifies globally, GAD’s institutionalised forms have proven ill-equipped to defend hard-won gains or challenge power. Drawing on feminist scholarship, intersectional critique, and practitioner experience, we argue that reclaiming GAD as a political project demands more than better tools—it requires resourcing feminist movements, confronting systemic oppression, and moving from managerialism to cross-movement solidarity. Feminist organising, not technical fixes, is the most effective driver of gender justice. In an era of political repression, climate crisis, and shrinking civic space, it is time to reassert GAD’s radical origins and turn the power back on.