错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Jurisprudential Inquiry into the Dialogic Imperative of Criminal Procedure

  • Purvi Pokhariyal,
  • Deepa Dubey

摘要

Injustice is a complex and multifaceted issue that can manifest in various forms, including economic, social, and political injustices. These injustices are often perpetuated and reinforced by the dialectics of law and lack of dialogic criminal procedure. The law is a social construct that is in constant flux, reflecting the values and beliefs of society at large. This dialectical relationship is particularly evident in the criminal justice system, where the law regulates and controls individual behavior. However, the effectiveness of the law in achieving these goals is often called into question, particularly when it comes to the treatment of victims of crime. This chapter aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the dialectics of law in the criminal justice system and how dialogic procedure can play a role in the pursuit of justice. The chapter begins by providing a kaleidoscopic perspective on access to justice and how justice can be pursued by legitimizing the dialogic procedure. The chapter further analyzes the impact of legal education and the role of jurists in mediating the dialectics of law in the criminal justice system by propagating dialogic procedures for all the stakeholders, such as the significance of “victim impact statements” (VIS) in the criminal justice delivery system, VIS envelops the complete distress faced by the victim due the occurrence of the crime, therapeutic jurisprudence, and communicative theory. This chapter explores and analyzes such a dialogic procedure that leads to better representation of the victims, promoting rehabilitative jurisprudence in India. The central contention of the chapter delves into the dialogic criminal procedure that seeks to facilitate a more restorative than punitive approach by creating opportunities for dialogue and negotiation. Furthermore, the chapter examines the implications of the dialectics of law for the future of the criminal justice system. The chapter argues that a deeper understanding of the dialectics of law through legal education is essential for developing a more effective and equitable justice system, and there is a need to address the structural and systemic issues that create disparities and inequalities in the criminal justice system.