Scholarlink

This chapter analyses Jordan’s electoral politics from 1989 to 2024 under Hashemite rule through lenses of electoral authoritarianism, competitive clientelism with bounded participation, and adaptive authoritarianism. Successive reforms, from Block Vote (1989) and Single Non-Transferable Vote (SNTV; 1993) to a mixed SNTV plus proportional representation (PR) tier (2013), open-list PR (2016), and the current mixed model (2022), channel competition without redistributing authority. Rule design, districting, party law, and quota placement favour rural and tribal constituencies while blunting programmatic, urban actors, notably the Islamic Action Front. Legal and administrative measures, including party regulation and the recognition of Islamist splinters, reinforce this architecture. Public engagement declined: turnout fell from about 63 per cent in 1989 to 29.9 per cent in 2020 and recovered only to just over 32 per cent in 2024. Women’s representation rose through quotas, although independent gains remained limited where clientelistic networks prevail. The chapter argues that reforms recalibrate rather than democratise by managing dissent while preserving monarchical control.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The Illusion of Reform: Electoral Politics and Monarchical Authority in Jordan

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Sujata Ashwarya

摘要

This chapter analyses Jordan’s electoral politics from 1989 to 2024 under Hashemite rule through lenses of electoral authoritarianism, competitive clientelism with bounded participation, and adaptive authoritarianism. Successive reforms, from Block Vote (1989) and Single Non-Transferable Vote (SNTV; 1993) to a mixed SNTV plus proportional representation (PR) tier (2013), open-list PR (2016), and the current mixed model (2022), channel competition without redistributing authority. Rule design, districting, party law, and quota placement favour rural and tribal constituencies while blunting programmatic, urban actors, notably the Islamic Action Front. Legal and administrative measures, including party regulation and the recognition of Islamist splinters, reinforce this architecture. Public engagement declined: turnout fell from about 63 per cent in 1989 to 29.9 per cent in 2020 and recovered only to just over 32 per cent in 2024. Women’s representation rose through quotas, although independent gains remained limited where clientelistic networks prevail. The chapter argues that reforms recalibrate rather than democratise by managing dissent while preserving monarchical control.