This chapter introduces a foundational volume dedicated to establishing a robust linguistic anthropology of Iran, a field conspicuously absent in Iranian academia. It narrates the intellectual and institutional challenges of assembling this work, in which the dominance of traditional linguistics required a fundamental reorientation toward viewing language not as an autonomous system but as embodied social practice and culture-in-talk. The chapter argues for a radical methodological shift, conceptualizing language as a dynamic loom where society, culture, and history intertwine. It synthesizes the volume’s diverse chapters, which analyze Persian honorifics as tools of sanction, the reclamation of Iranian Sign Language, diasporic family language policies, and more, to demonstrate how language constitutes social life, from intimate family dynamics to nationalist myth-making. Finally, the introduction maps an ambitious future for the field, proposing five key research directions, from spaces of encounter and the materiality of language to decolonizing methodologies, arguing that a sophisticated Iranian linguistic anthropology is essential for understanding the nation’s contested social transformations and for challenging the Eurocentric biases of the discipline itself.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Introduction: Toward a Linguistic Anthropology of Iran

  • Zia Khoshsirat

摘要

This chapter introduces a foundational volume dedicated to establishing a robust linguistic anthropology of Iran, a field conspicuously absent in Iranian academia. It narrates the intellectual and institutional challenges of assembling this work, in which the dominance of traditional linguistics required a fundamental reorientation toward viewing language not as an autonomous system but as embodied social practice and culture-in-talk. The chapter argues for a radical methodological shift, conceptualizing language as a dynamic loom where society, culture, and history intertwine. It synthesizes the volume’s diverse chapters, which analyze Persian honorifics as tools of sanction, the reclamation of Iranian Sign Language, diasporic family language policies, and more, to demonstrate how language constitutes social life, from intimate family dynamics to nationalist myth-making. Finally, the introduction maps an ambitious future for the field, proposing five key research directions, from spaces of encounter and the materiality of language to decolonizing methodologies, arguing that a sophisticated Iranian linguistic anthropology is essential for understanding the nation’s contested social transformations and for challenging the Eurocentric biases of the discipline itself.