The increasing integration of social robots into human environments introduces novel risks, particularly the potential for socio-emotional exploitation through social engineering attacks. Traditional cybersecurity measures are often inadequate against threats that leverage human psychological and social vulnerabilities. This paper reviews the challenges posed by socio-emotional exploitation in human-robot interaction (HRI), particularly in the context of healthcare and social aspects. It examines adaptive defense mechanisms, specifically focusing on approaches utilizing real-time physiological signals. Drawing on the foundational work of Pasquali et al. and related literature, this review details the concept of physiologically-informed defense, analyzes its methodological foundations and empirical findings, and discusses its significance, limitations, and profound ethical implications, while also proposing avenues for future research and broader integration of literature.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Adaptive Defense Against Socio-emotional Exploitation in Social Robots: A Review of Physiologically-Informed Approaches

  • Danilo Greco,
  • Lorenzo D’Errico

摘要

The increasing integration of social robots into human environments introduces novel risks, particularly the potential for socio-emotional exploitation through social engineering attacks. Traditional cybersecurity measures are often inadequate against threats that leverage human psychological and social vulnerabilities. This paper reviews the challenges posed by socio-emotional exploitation in human-robot interaction (HRI), particularly in the context of healthcare and social aspects. It examines adaptive defense mechanisms, specifically focusing on approaches utilizing real-time physiological signals. Drawing on the foundational work of Pasquali et al. and related literature, this review details the concept of physiologically-informed defense, analyzes its methodological foundations and empirical findings, and discusses its significance, limitations, and profound ethical implications, while also proposing avenues for future research and broader integration of literature.