In India, reinforced concrete (RC) structures are under a persistent threat from seismic activity, which has the potential to cause substantial structural damage and endanger the safety of the building's occupants. To address this concern, seismic-resistant design practices are essential, considering various factors such as seismic zones, site conditions, building importance, and response reduction factors. This study presents a comparative analysis of the performance of an RC building designed as an Ordinary Moment Resisting Frame (OMRF) versus a Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) using non-linear analysis techniques. Non-linear analysis is conducted using software ETABS, according to Indian Codal provisions, for both OMRF and SMRF designs. The case study is in Zone II, characterized by moderate seismic activity. This paper aims to determine the optimal design approach considering serviceability, cost-benefit comparison between OMRF and SMRF, including the increased ductility and detailing requirements of SMRF versus the simpler detailing in OMRF and Performance under Seismic Parameters. The analysis encompasses a comprehensive range of seismic parameters, including Story drift, Base Shear, Time history response, Acceleration, Overturning Moment, Deformation, and Story Forces. Additionally, the study extends to the detailed design of a typical structural element, comparing the required reinforcement and detailing according to OMRF and SMRF provisions outlined in the Indian Code. The results of this study provide insights into the structural behavior of OMRF and SMRF systems under seismic loading.