Disease engulfs the entire world impacting heavily upon all social institutions including healthcare in pandemic. Covid-19 is instrumental in reflecting ‘new-normalcy’ assumed to be unwell vis-à-vis healthy as a direct corollary of well-being in present times. Though all of us have treated the path of ill-health in recent times and may have recovered down the line biologically yet insufficient to ensure intrinsic satisfaction of holistic development. Then the right to question emerges in mind, what is the ‘new-normal’ or is ‘feel good’ an offshoot of being healthy? Does ‘being healthy’ implies global health standards as universal for all? Therefore, the aim is to focus on health equity and connected range of constraints intersectional to the approach of this disguised health anxiety as (un)developed nations reckon with the gender injustice and inequity failing to guarantee health for all. In the present situation depression and anxiety are overlapping, more so, multiple stress as gendered is embedded in unequal society. Intersectionality of women across age, caste, and class are more likely to the abuse and trauma of the social system. Although there are structural constraints in some countries where there are community health workers, yet care is discreetly accessed exhausting the exclusion of certain communities. The research was conducted across 250 women on health-stress working as professionals, self-employed, and teachers working online across India. This inquiry is on the excruciating definitions on three counts firstly; is physical health an offshoot of physiology alone; secondly, is there any relationship between well-being and health; and thirdly under the patriarchy women are subordinate and so is their biological clock assuming them to be diseased at various stages of their life. Significantly enough, the cognitive analysis of mental health around the world is universally applicable to gendered analysis in critical health?