Scholarlink

To address the challenges in modern product development, the case industry must identify the most effective process for additive manufacturing. In product design, selecting the right method involves evaluating alternatives based on various criteria, which can be challenging when these criteria are difficult to quantify. This paper employs a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach, specifically the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), to determine the optimal process among selective laser sintering, fused deposition modeling, direct metal laser sintering, 3D printing, and stereolithography. The AHP model is structured with 10 criteria and 5 processes aligned with a pre-defined objective. AHP helps identify the process with the greatest impact on achieving this objective. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for process leaders in the manufacturing industry.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Analytical Hierarchy Process-Based Selection of Additive Manufacturing Processes

  • 会议论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Kishan Fuse,
  • Nagorao Surner,
  • Kiran Wakhchaure

摘要

To address the challenges in modern product development, the case industry must identify the most effective process for additive manufacturing. In product design, selecting the right method involves evaluating alternatives based on various criteria, which can be challenging when these criteria are difficult to quantify. This paper employs a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach, specifically the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), to determine the optimal process among selective laser sintering, fused deposition modeling, direct metal laser sintering, 3D printing, and stereolithography. The AHP model is structured with 10 criteria and 5 processes aligned with a pre-defined objective. AHP helps identify the process with the greatest impact on achieving this objective. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for process leaders in the manufacturing industry.