错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

In Between the Glass Ceiling: A Gender Comparison Study of Outcomes of Management Education

  • Shawna John

摘要

In today’s technology-driven educational and professional landscape, this chapter explores how management education prepares male and female students to overcome gender-based barriers, particularly in tech-dominated fields. The analysis emphasizes how digital transformation intersects with the glass ceiling phenomenon, influencing leadership representation and outcomes. The chapter outlines the various factors that play a significant role in shaping outcomes of gender-related differences in management education. These factors range from academic performance, leadership opportunities to career progression within the context of Management Education. The chapter does a comprehensive analysis of such outcomes in the field of management and leadership. Equipped with qualitative information from various sources such as student experiences, institutional practices and quantitative data from student grades, graduation rate and employment figures, the findings are interpreted thereof. The achievement of male and female students in academic settings, though comparable, seemed to show significant differences in leadership roles and career orientation. With notable challenges faced by the female students in leadership opportunities, mentorship and guidance, which cause significant hindrance to the female gender thereby affecting their capacity and career on the whole, these challenges delve well within socio-cultural norms, organizational policies that perpetuate gender stereotypes limiting women’s capacity to progress and a significant underrepresentation in senior roles and responsibilities alike. The research further delves into examining the influence of Socio- cultural stereotypes and biases in shaping educational experiences and their outcomes of Male and Female students. Furthermore, it highlights the ways in which these influencers change the overall career trajectory of these students and how the presented opportunities differ from gender to gender affecting their decisions. The chapter also presents reparations to diminish these significant differences in order to create equity and diversity in the field of management education and leadership roles by promoting gender- neutral leadership development initiatives and fostering gender inclusive organizational policies without compromising competency, thereby enabling an environment that poses a challenge to the traditional gender roles. By enacting these measures, institutions can ensure that both men and women are able to fully benefit from management education and achieve their professional potential, thereby creating a more equitable setting for all students.