I have not sought to repair liberalism—whether by proposing a more inclusive veil of ignorance, a more capacious standard of reasonableness, or an expanded architecture of rights (Rawls, 1971; Sen, 2006; Wolff, 2015). My intervention has been oriented elsewhere. It has aimed to unsettle the epistemic comforts of liberal political thought: its abstractions that masquerade as universals, its procedures that efface history, and its normative grammars of reason that silence more than they disclose (Shklar, 1990; Heinze, 2013; Goodhart, 2018). What is offered here is not an internal correction but a deliberate departure.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Conclusion: Listening to Injustice—Beyond Liberalism and the Remaking of the Political

  • Asis Mistry

摘要

I have not sought to repair liberalism—whether by proposing a more inclusive veil of ignorance, a more capacious standard of reasonableness, or an expanded architecture of rights (Rawls, 1971; Sen, 2006; Wolff, 2015). My intervention has been oriented elsewhere. It has aimed to unsettle the epistemic comforts of liberal political thought: its abstractions that masquerade as universals, its procedures that efface history, and its normative grammars of reason that silence more than they disclose (Shklar, 1990; Heinze, 2013; Goodhart, 2018). What is offered here is not an internal correction but a deliberate departure.