Chapter 4 outlines the debates of wether there is a separate category of supererogatory actions within the categorical system of the deontic logic. Deontologigal Antisupererogationism doubts that such a category can exist using the argument that morally valuable actions are to be assigned to the category of duty due to their moral value (see Sect. 4.1). Deontological Supererogationism describes the category of supererogatory actions as a subclass of the imperfect duties (see Sect. 4.2) or as recommended actions (see Sect. 4.3) or as actions whose omission is permitted (see Sect.4.4) or as voluntary actions (see Sect. 4.5) or as praiseworthy actions (see sect. 4.6).

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Deontology and Categories

  • Marie-Luise Raters

摘要

Chapter 4 outlines the debates of wether there is a separate category of supererogatory actions within the categorical system of the deontic logic. Deontologigal Antisupererogationism doubts that such a category can exist using the argument that morally valuable actions are to be assigned to the category of duty due to their moral value (see Sect. 4.1). Deontological Supererogationism describes the category of supererogatory actions as a subclass of the imperfect duties (see Sect. 4.2) or as recommended actions (see Sect. 4.3) or as actions whose omission is permitted (see Sect.4.4) or as voluntary actions (see Sect. 4.5) or as praiseworthy actions (see sect. 4.6).