This thesis takes a qualitative, cross-case approach to understanding the recurring roadblocks in blockchain implementation for land registries across a series of selected real-world case studies. The general goal is not to confirm a theory but to map out recurring patterns across multiple contexts. This method follows the comparative logic laid out by Miles et al. (2014) who argue that well-designed cross-case analysis helps both in surfacing robust insights and increasing the applicability of findings to other similar contexts.