The preliminary experiments underscore the significant impact of vial and filter materials on PFAS recovery. Glass vials caused substantial analyte loss, whereas Waters polypropylene (PP) vials preserved target concentrations accurately. Similarly, cellulose acetate (CA) filters demonstrated consistently minimal PFAS adsorption, making them an optimal choice for sample preparation.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Conclusion and Outlook

  • Konstantin Huter

摘要

The preliminary experiments underscore the significant impact of vial and filter materials on PFAS recovery. Glass vials caused substantial analyte loss, whereas Waters polypropylene (PP) vials preserved target concentrations accurately. Similarly, cellulose acetate (CA) filters demonstrated consistently minimal PFAS adsorption, making them an optimal choice for sample preparation.