This conclusion evaluates the legacies of post-Fukushima activism, primarily focusing on Civil Society Organisations’ (CSOs’) advocacy that utilised the legislative system of Diet Member bills (DM bills). Comparing the implementation of the Nuclear Disaster Victims’ Support Law with those of other DM bills, it reveals pitfalls in implementing such bills, notably the lack of an advisory committee and guidelines for the implementation of the law. A comparison with the effectively implemented Child Poverty Law and Hate Speech Law highlights that strong local advocacy and local ordinances are crucial for the successful implementation of DM bills initiated by CSOs. The conclusion thus offers insights into developing strategies for CSOs’ future success in national advocacy and organisational strengthening.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Conclusion

  • Ayaka Löschke

摘要

This conclusion evaluates the legacies of post-Fukushima activism, primarily focusing on Civil Society Organisations’ (CSOs’) advocacy that utilised the legislative system of Diet Member bills (DM bills). Comparing the implementation of the Nuclear Disaster Victims’ Support Law with those of other DM bills, it reveals pitfalls in implementing such bills, notably the lack of an advisory committee and guidelines for the implementation of the law. A comparison with the effectively implemented Child Poverty Law and Hate Speech Law highlights that strong local advocacy and local ordinances are crucial for the successful implementation of DM bills initiated by CSOs. The conclusion thus offers insights into developing strategies for CSOs’ future success in national advocacy and organisational strengthening.