In the complex landscape of post-colonial Southeast Asia, this research delves into the intricate local expressions of the global discourse surrounding “indigeneity.” Originating from Western settler states, this discourse has become pivotal in the international struggle for indigenous rights, visibility, and autonomy. The study scrutinizes how the concept of “indigeneity” is both discursively constructed and practically embodied, maintaining ties to its international roots while deviating in form and purpose. Central to the global movement, “indigeneity” has evolved into a criterial and relational category, emphasizing not only historical ties to land but also a colonized and oppressed subjectivity. In the context of Southeast Asia, where debates and governmental attitudes towards “indigeneity” are rife, the study employs the framework of “articulation” to critically engage with existing literature. It reveals the myriad ways in which the global discourse manifests in complex articulations and practices, deeply entangled with pre-colonial and colonial representations. While “indigeneity” carries undeniable political significance, its usage by various actors for diverse purposes introduces an exclusionary potential. The research also highlights the case of Vietnam, where the political connotation of the notion is obscured by particular linguistic choices, which simultaneously excludes certain terms and meanings while foregrounding others in public space. In such instances, the discourse may be subtly mobilized in covert forms to advance similar agendas. This study offers a nuanced exploration of the multifaceted and contested terrain surrounding “indigeneity” in contemporary Southeast Asia, shedding light on the intricacies of its local articulations and their implications.