In their writings on world history, Kant and Hegel share an ultimately consoling assessment of humanity’s prospects for moral progress. Nonetheless, the two philosophers derive different kinds of consolation from their world historical reflections. They do so, I argue, because of their respective metaphysical commitments. In this paper, I suggest that the kind of consolation each derives from world history may be understood to derive from their unique assumptions about the resources of human feeling as a source of the good.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Moral Feeling and the Consolations of World History. Kant Versus Hegel

  • Sally Sedgwick

摘要

In their writings on world history, Kant and Hegel share an ultimately consoling assessment of humanity’s prospects for moral progress. Nonetheless, the two philosophers derive different kinds of consolation from their world historical reflections. They do so, I argue, because of their respective metaphysical commitments. In this paper, I suggest that the kind of consolation each derives from world history may be understood to derive from their unique assumptions about the resources of human feeling as a source of the good.