The search for a solution in an extremely large search tree presents a problem for nearly all inference systems. From the starting state there are many possibilities for the first inference step. For each of these possibilities there are again many possibilities in the next step, and so on. Even in the proof of a very simple formula from [Ert93] with three Horn clauses, each with at most three literals, the search tree for SLD-resolution has the following shape: The tree was cut off at a depth of 14 and has a solution in the leaf node marked by  \({*}\) . It is only possible to represent it at all because of the small branching factorBranching factor of at most two and a cutoff at depth 14. For realistic problems, the branching factor and depth of the first solution may become significantly bigger.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Search, Games and Problem Solving

  • Wolfgang Ertel

摘要

The search for a solution in an extremely large search tree presents a problem for nearly all inference systems. From the starting state there are many possibilities for the first inference step. For each of these possibilities there are again many possibilities in the next step, and so on. Even in the proof of a very simple formula from [Ert93] with three Horn clauses, each with at most three literals, the search tree for SLD-resolution has the following shape: The tree was cut off at a depth of 14 and has a solution in the leaf node marked by  \({*}\) . It is only possible to represent it at all because of the small branching factorBranching factor of at most two and a cutoff at depth 14. For realistic problems, the branching factor and depth of the first solution may become significantly bigger.