From Hype to Judgment: Reassessing the Gartner Cycle for Decision-Making in the Age of Generative AI
摘要
The Gartner Hype Cycle (GHC) remains a cornerstone of technology strategy; however, the rapid acceleration of Generative AI (GAI) challenges its predictive validity. This study evaluates the GHC’s utility through a systematic review of 41 Web of Science-indexed articles, classifying academic discourse into supportive, critical, and adaptive positions. By contrasting GHC stage assignments with empirical adoption signals, including user engagement, media sentiment, and investment trends, we identify a significant divergence, particularly regarding the “Trough of Disillusionment.” Our analysis demonstrates that this misalignment undermines the model’s strategic value in high-velocity contexts. Consequently, we propose a replicable, data-driven framework utilizing publicly available indicators to complement traditional GHC analysis, ensuring that decision science remains commensurate with the rapid evolution of intelligent systems.