Scholarlink

While direct strategies seek to reduce biases by reshaping individual traits, indirect approaches target the environment responsible for generating biases. By modifying contextual factors, indirect methods create better conditions for moral evaluation without demanding extensive individual change. This chapter analyzes the strengths and limitations of two such approaches: collective moral reasoning (Sect. 8.2), which promotes intersubjective discussion and the division of cognitive labor, and nudging (Sect. 8.3), which alters choice architecture to influence behavior. It then considers two recent hybrid strategies—nudge plus (Sect. 8.4.1) and boosts (Sect. 8.4.2)—which combine environmental adjustments with individual reflection and competence-building.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Debiasing Strategies: Indirect and Hybrid Approaches

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Dario Cecchini

摘要

While direct strategies seek to reduce biases by reshaping individual traits, indirect approaches target the environment responsible for generating biases. By modifying contextual factors, indirect methods create better conditions for moral evaluation without demanding extensive individual change. This chapter analyzes the strengths and limitations of two such approaches: collective moral reasoning (Sect. 8.2), which promotes intersubjective discussion and the division of cognitive labor, and nudging (Sect. 8.3), which alters choice architecture to influence behavior. It then considers two recent hybrid strategies—nudge plus (Sect. 8.4.1) and boosts (Sect. 8.4.2)—which combine environmental adjustments with individual reflection and competence-building.