Scholarlink

This chapter develops a critical analysis of Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA). FRIA is a risk-based and ex-ante mandatory procedure for evaluating potential impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) systems that makes an appearance in Article 27 of the AI Act but has not yet entered into force. Nonetheless, it is possible to evaluate it as a distinct type of governance instrument and to understand how it is intended to contribute to AI oversight. FRIA promises to integrate fundamental rights concerns in the cycle of development of AI systems and foster accountability and transparency. The issue is approached by situating FRIA within the broader historical and conceptual landscape of the governance of emerging technologies, with a specific focus on the practice of technology assessment (TA). TA has become a central tool in contemporary governance to evaluate the social, legal and economic consequences of emerging technologies. Drawing on past and current experience in TA, we will examine the methodological and implementation challenges to FRIA, as a tool to produce enhanced knowledge about AI within society and as an effective instrument for steering technological development. Overall, our contribution offers a preliminary evaluation of FRIA, its potential use, and foreseeable challenges. These insights are meant to identify new possible directions for research in legal and social sciences and to improve accountability, transparency and social responsiveness in AI governance.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Governing AI Through Assessment: A Critical Analysis of FRIA from a Technology Assessment Perspective

  • 会议论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Pierluigi Masai,
  • Lorenzo Carta,
  • Simone Arnaldi

摘要

This chapter develops a critical analysis of Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA). FRIA is a risk-based and ex-ante mandatory procedure for evaluating potential impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) systems that makes an appearance in Article 27 of the AI Act but has not yet entered into force. Nonetheless, it is possible to evaluate it as a distinct type of governance instrument and to understand how it is intended to contribute to AI oversight. FRIA promises to integrate fundamental rights concerns in the cycle of development of AI systems and foster accountability and transparency. The issue is approached by situating FRIA within the broader historical and conceptual landscape of the governance of emerging technologies, with a specific focus on the practice of technology assessment (TA). TA has become a central tool in contemporary governance to evaluate the social, legal and economic consequences of emerging technologies. Drawing on past and current experience in TA, we will examine the methodological and implementation challenges to FRIA, as a tool to produce enhanced knowledge about AI within society and as an effective instrument for steering technological development. Overall, our contribution offers a preliminary evaluation of FRIA, its potential use, and foreseeable challenges. These insights are meant to identify new possible directions for research in legal and social sciences and to improve accountability, transparency and social responsiveness in AI governance.