Scholarlink

The integration of structural and functional brain connectivity provides a holistic view of the brain’s organization, but its application in Graph Neural Network (GNN) models for predicting “brain age” is understudied, and a systematic benchmark of optimal data fusion strategies is currently lacking. We systematically benchmark the performances of early and late fusion multimodal architectures against single-modality models for brain age prediction using structural and functional connectomes, using five different GNN backbones on 747 healthy participants (median age, 16.3 years; IQR 13.5-18.5 years) obtained from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. The late fusion architecture improved performance over the structural-only baseline in three of five models, with the GCN model achieving the highest overall score in cross-validation ( \(R^2=0.639 \pm 0.05\) ). The early fusion architecture showed inconsistent results and did not offer a reliable improvement over the single-modality baseline. Finally, it is observed that optimal model architecture depends on the data type: structural brain graphs favor deep, narrow models to capture their hierarchy, whereas functional brain graphs require wider, shallower models.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Late and Early Fusion Graph Neural Network Architectures for Integrative Modeling of Multimodal Brain Connectivity Graphs

  • 会议论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Alessio Comparini,
  • Léa Schmidt,
  • Vanessa Siffredi,
  • Damien Marie,
  • Clara E. James,
  • Jonas Richiardi

摘要

The integration of structural and functional brain connectivity provides a holistic view of the brain’s organization, but its application in Graph Neural Network (GNN) models for predicting “brain age” is understudied, and a systematic benchmark of optimal data fusion strategies is currently lacking. We systematically benchmark the performances of early and late fusion multimodal architectures against single-modality models for brain age prediction using structural and functional connectomes, using five different GNN backbones on 747 healthy participants (median age, 16.3 years; IQR 13.5-18.5 years) obtained from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. The late fusion architecture improved performance over the structural-only baseline in three of five models, with the GCN model achieving the highest overall score in cross-validation ( \(R^2=0.639 \pm 0.05\) ). The early fusion architecture showed inconsistent results and did not offer a reliable improvement over the single-modality baseline. Finally, it is observed that optimal model architecture depends on the data type: structural brain graphs favor deep, narrow models to capture their hierarchy, whereas functional brain graphs require wider, shallower models.