The ambition of this chapter is to delimit the field of hermeneutics, which is in contrast to other sciences or philosophies of language. The path we are exploring offers a paradoxical twofold movement, both shrinking and expanding hermeneutics. Interpretation only arises for a particular category of signs, the meaning of which is problematic depending on given contexts and the experience of the interpreters. At the same time, we add a movement, on another plane, of enlargement of the object of hermeneutics. As problematic meanings are in no way reducible, neither to linguistic signs (utterances, texts...), nor to two-way signs (symbols) which are only a part of it. In other words, any sign (iconic, indicative or linguistic) whose source can be natural or conventional, via visual, auditory or olfactory channels involves a problematicity, as it is resistant to immediate understanding, and can be interpreted and correlatively fall within the field of hermeneutics.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Grasping a Sign

  • Johann Michel

摘要

The ambition of this chapter is to delimit the field of hermeneutics, which is in contrast to other sciences or philosophies of language. The path we are exploring offers a paradoxical twofold movement, both shrinking and expanding hermeneutics. Interpretation only arises for a particular category of signs, the meaning of which is problematic depending on given contexts and the experience of the interpreters. At the same time, we add a movement, on another plane, of enlargement of the object of hermeneutics. As problematic meanings are in no way reducible, neither to linguistic signs (utterances, texts...), nor to two-way signs (symbols) which are only a part of it. In other words, any sign (iconic, indicative or linguistic) whose source can be natural or conventional, via visual, auditory or olfactory channels involves a problematicity, as it is resistant to immediate understanding, and can be interpreted and correlatively fall within the field of hermeneutics.