Traditional Authorities—A Contradictory Mix Between Centralised Authority and Devolved Authority
摘要
This chapter discusses the evolution of traditional leadersTraditional leaders in ZimbabweZimbabwe highlighting how they have interacted with modern governments. Traditional leadersTraditional leaders in ZimbabweZimbabwe have long stood at the crossroads of cultural authority and formal governanceGovernance. They remain relevant customary leaders in rural communities in Zimbabwe. Since colonial rule, their role in land allocation, justice administration, tax collection, and even local security has been gradually absorbed by StateState institutions and local government structures. Chiefs no longer have full control over communal land, and their judicial powers are now limited to settling minor disputes under customary law. However, their influence and legitimacy is shaped by their cultural leadership authority. Their ability to resolve conflicts is rooted in tradition. Traditional leadersTraditional leaders are recognised in the 2013 ConstitutionConstitution and Traditional LeadersTraditional leaders Act. They are key actors in rural development and play a crucial role in promoting inclusive sustainable developmentSustainable development. However, their close association with political parties threatens their credibility as non-partisan actors and community leaders. c. This is particularly concerning given that the 2013 ConstitutionConstitution clearly outlines their mandate. They are expected to remain politically neutral, upholding community values without aligning with any political agenda.Compromising this constitutional principle through patronage, partisan endorsements erodes public confidence and calls into question their legitimacy. political