This chapter investigates cognitive drones as advanced unmanned aerial systems (UAS) endowed with artificial minds capable of real-time reasoning, learning, and adaptive decision-making. Using a set of 40 organizations represented in energy, logistics, environment, and agriculture industries, we examine the artificial intelligence (AI) efficiency index, human–AI ratio, trust measures, and error recovery to understand the performance of drones and human interaction. The results indicate that AI-controlled drones are 35–40% more efficient, particularly in organized work processes such as energy and logistics, whereas other areas, such as agriculture, need human assistance. Automation and human control are the weak points, which is shown by a high correlation (R2 = 0.71) between trust and autonomy. The ethical and governance concerns of cognitive autonomy are covered, where human supervision is a vital component of ethical guarantee. The chapter has mentioned the idea of cognitive complements, where human rationality weighs the accuracy and massiveness of AI. This study seeks adaptive calibration of trust and explainable AI to enable responsible use of industry. The resulting findings shine the path to a hopeful future of hybrid intelligence among autonomous drones, and in turn, it promotes trust and stresses on the need for responsible use of AI when it comes to human-machine collaboration in UAS applications.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Cognitive Drones and Human–Artificial Intelligence Trust Calibration Across Industrial Sectors

  • Mohamed Ahmed Alloghani

摘要

This chapter investigates cognitive drones as advanced unmanned aerial systems (UAS) endowed with artificial minds capable of real-time reasoning, learning, and adaptive decision-making. Using a set of 40 organizations represented in energy, logistics, environment, and agriculture industries, we examine the artificial intelligence (AI) efficiency index, human–AI ratio, trust measures, and error recovery to understand the performance of drones and human interaction. The results indicate that AI-controlled drones are 35–40% more efficient, particularly in organized work processes such as energy and logistics, whereas other areas, such as agriculture, need human assistance. Automation and human control are the weak points, which is shown by a high correlation (R2 = 0.71) between trust and autonomy. The ethical and governance concerns of cognitive autonomy are covered, where human supervision is a vital component of ethical guarantee. The chapter has mentioned the idea of cognitive complements, where human rationality weighs the accuracy and massiveness of AI. This study seeks adaptive calibration of trust and explainable AI to enable responsible use of industry. The resulting findings shine the path to a hopeful future of hybrid intelligence among autonomous drones, and in turn, it promotes trust and stresses on the need for responsible use of AI when it comes to human-machine collaboration in UAS applications.