From the point of view of argument, stories are dangerously deceptive and manipulative; from the point of view of storytelling, arguments are aggressive and antagonizing. Both of these perspectives are valid, which is why we need a principled right division of labor between stories and arguments in political rhetoric. Instead of a “discourse ethics,” we need an ethics of argumentation and an ethics of storytelling.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Deceptive Stories and Coercive Arguments

  • James Bernard Murphy

摘要

From the point of view of argument, stories are dangerously deceptive and manipulative; from the point of view of storytelling, arguments are aggressive and antagonizing. Both of these perspectives are valid, which is why we need a principled right division of labor between stories and arguments in political rhetoric. Instead of a “discourse ethics,” we need an ethics of argumentation and an ethics of storytelling.