This chapter argues that conditionalities in non-contributory social protection can be problematic in normative terms because they involve a distrusting attitude towards individuals in conditions of poverty. I will argue that this attitude could be instrumentally used to restrict benefits and beneficiaries, to insult them, and to reinforce inegalitarian relations. These three aspects can affect the impact that social policies have on poverty reduction. Thus, they must be weighed against the potential benefits of increasing the level of reassurances and controls by the political community. This chapter identifies this attitude and analyzes if these three aspects are present in a popular set of policies that have been widespread in Latin-America and the rest of the Global South: Conditional Cash Transfers.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

When is Distrust Problematic in Conditional Cash Transfers?

  • Facundo García Valverde

摘要

This chapter argues that conditionalities in non-contributory social protection can be problematic in normative terms because they involve a distrusting attitude towards individuals in conditions of poverty. I will argue that this attitude could be instrumentally used to restrict benefits and beneficiaries, to insult them, and to reinforce inegalitarian relations. These three aspects can affect the impact that social policies have on poverty reduction. Thus, they must be weighed against the potential benefits of increasing the level of reassurances and controls by the political community. This chapter identifies this attitude and analyzes if these three aspects are present in a popular set of policies that have been widespread in Latin-America and the rest of the Global South: Conditional Cash Transfers.