As new EU buildings approach ultra–low-energy or near-zero-energy standards, reducing operational energy further becomes challenging. In contrast, the pre‐operational phase-which includes raw material extraction, manufacturing, transportation, and construction-offers significant savings in primary energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, no standard exists for embodied energy. Here, we propose developing benchmarks expressed per unit of heated area that account for the building shape factor and distinguish between high‐mass and lightweight envelope systems. Using simplified examples, we demonstrate that relative assessments (e.g., PENRT or GWP per m2 of heated floor area) better reflect true environmental performance than absolute criteria.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Benchmarks for Assessing the Embodied Primary Energy Input and Global Warming Potential

  • Roman Rabenseifer,
  • Katarína Minarovičová,
  • Nataliia Mahas,
  • Martina Kalivodová,
  • Robert Provazník

摘要

As new EU buildings approach ultra–low-energy or near-zero-energy standards, reducing operational energy further becomes challenging. In contrast, the pre‐operational phase-which includes raw material extraction, manufacturing, transportation, and construction-offers significant savings in primary energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, no standard exists for embodied energy. Here, we propose developing benchmarks expressed per unit of heated area that account for the building shape factor and distinguish between high‐mass and lightweight envelope systems. Using simplified examples, we demonstrate that relative assessments (e.g., PENRT or GWP per m2 of heated floor area) better reflect true environmental performance than absolute criteria.