Antarctica is often depicted as a realm of extreme alterity, defined by its harsh environment and pristine wilderness. For many, it remains an alien space—devoid of indigenous populations and inhabited only temporarily by researchers, logistical staff, and tourists. While it is designated as a territory for peaceful scientific cooperation in the interest of all humankind, Antarctica is not immune to geopolitical interests, nationalism, and exclusionary dynamics. In this chapter, I explore how an archaeology of political action can critically examine the continent’s past and present. I begin by discussing how dominant narratives have reinforced alienation, naturalizing Antarctica’s association with a select group of actors. Drawing on the Landscapes in White project, I then explore how a critical approach can illuminate marginalized voices at the intersections of class, nationality, and ethnicity. Finally, I reflect on the challenges of pursuing an emancipatory agenda, particularly in terms of engaging diverse communities with Antarctic archaeology.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Political Action in Frozen Lands: Insights from Antarctic Archaeology

  • Melisa A. Salerno

摘要

Antarctica is often depicted as a realm of extreme alterity, defined by its harsh environment and pristine wilderness. For many, it remains an alien space—devoid of indigenous populations and inhabited only temporarily by researchers, logistical staff, and tourists. While it is designated as a territory for peaceful scientific cooperation in the interest of all humankind, Antarctica is not immune to geopolitical interests, nationalism, and exclusionary dynamics. In this chapter, I explore how an archaeology of political action can critically examine the continent’s past and present. I begin by discussing how dominant narratives have reinforced alienation, naturalizing Antarctica’s association with a select group of actors. Drawing on the Landscapes in White project, I then explore how a critical approach can illuminate marginalized voices at the intersections of class, nationality, and ethnicity. Finally, I reflect on the challenges of pursuing an emancipatory agenda, particularly in terms of engaging diverse communities with Antarctic archaeology.