Rebuilding the Walls: Faithful Judges and Faithful Judging
摘要
According to the Christian conservative master narrative, ungodly rulings like Obergefell v. Hodges and Roe v. Wade were part a larger trend first discernible in Supreme Court decisions from the 1960s but intellectually rooted in a longer history of secular humanist judges intent on moving the nation away from its divine founding covenant. This trend of ungodly decisions, Christian conservatives believed, included both a personnel problem and an interpretation problem, and each problem reinforced the other.