Scholarlink

In a world of growing transparency and interdependence, the sustainability of corporate value chains has become a material concern for investors across asset classes. From upstream resource extraction to downstream consumer impacts, companies are now held accountable not only for their direct operations but also for the ESG performance of their value chain and broader ecosystem. This applies as much to industrial companies managing physical supply chains and energy intensity, as to mining companies addressing corruption risk and worker standards, to consumer goods companies focusing on the public health impact of their products, or service firms, where cybersecurity, data privacy and workforce labor practices impact sustainability outcomes. This shift is reinforced by regulation. The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) extend corporate responsibility deep into value chains, particularly on issues such as Scope 3 carbon emissions, labor conditions and biodiversity. Similarly, global standards such as the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB)’s baseline standards IFRS S1 and S2, as well as investor-led frameworks like the ESG integration guidelines of the UN Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI) emphasize the financial relevance of value chain exposure to ESG factors (see Sect. 1.3, ESG Regulatory Developments). Investors increasingly see sustainable value chain practices as no longer a matter of compliance alone, but rather as key differentiators in investment decision-making, allowing them to identify companies which are structurally positioned to thrive in a low-carbon, socially responsible economy and those which are exposed to escalating operational, regulatory and reputational risks. For example, strong ESG practices across the value chain may support earnings resilience in listed equities, drive value enhancement in private equity investing and help reduce regulatory and execution risks in infrastructure investing (see Sect. 4, Impact of ESG on Investment Performance).

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Relevance of Sustainable Value Creation to Investors

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Mirjam Staub-Bisang

摘要

In a world of growing transparency and interdependence, the sustainability of corporate value chains has become a material concern for investors across asset classes. From upstream resource extraction to downstream consumer impacts, companies are now held accountable not only for their direct operations but also for the ESG performance of their value chain and broader ecosystem. This applies as much to industrial companies managing physical supply chains and energy intensity, as to mining companies addressing corruption risk and worker standards, to consumer goods companies focusing on the public health impact of their products, or service firms, where cybersecurity, data privacy and workforce labor practices impact sustainability outcomes. This shift is reinforced by regulation. The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) extend corporate responsibility deep into value chains, particularly on issues such as Scope 3 carbon emissions, labor conditions and biodiversity. Similarly, global standards such as the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB)’s baseline standards IFRS S1 and S2, as well as investor-led frameworks like the ESG integration guidelines of the UN Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI) emphasize the financial relevance of value chain exposure to ESG factors (see Sect. 1.3, ESG Regulatory Developments). Investors increasingly see sustainable value chain practices as no longer a matter of compliance alone, but rather as key differentiators in investment decision-making, allowing them to identify companies which are structurally positioned to thrive in a low-carbon, socially responsible economy and those which are exposed to escalating operational, regulatory and reputational risks. For example, strong ESG practices across the value chain may support earnings resilience in listed equities, drive value enhancement in private equity investing and help reduce regulatory and execution risks in infrastructure investing (see Sect. 4, Impact of ESG on Investment Performance).